Cochineal Beetles (Dactylopius Coccus) Cochineal beetles eat the prickly pear cactus in South America. Pucker up because according to "The New York Times" when they are full of cactus juice, these insects are scraped off the plant, boiled and dried out and crushed into "carmine," which is used in a particular red dye that's used in some lipstick and blush. The good news is, by 2011 Malkan says that cosmetic companies will have to disclose any bug ingredients in their makeup.
Gross, but I guess ignorance is bliss. If a product works well, I don't want to know if there's something perceived as disgusting in it. It's all relative too. Some ingredients accepted widely in some places are considered disgusting elsewhere.
I feel like some of these products are even in our food products. Anyone heard about Starbucks using insect red dye to make their baked goods? On the bright side, thanks to consumers, Starbucks is finally changing it around and usually tomato red dye instead.
Shock Value..that's all. A great article would be ... just what ARE those ingredients in my beauty products (names I can't pronounce) and what are they suppose to do. Come on, those photos were just disgusting and belong on a creepshow blog.
Don't know which of these is the worst... although the road-kill is disturbing... and how in the world are they getting HUMAN BREAST MILK for these products?!?!?! One more argument for truth in advertising!
I wish that there had been a list of what companies use some of this stuff. I am definately going to start reading the labels. I think I can do without crushed bugs and whale vomit...
What grosses me out most about this list is that someone ACTUALLY said at one point in time things like: "Hmm.. I think I'll take that whale vomit and make it into perfume," or "Perhaps I'll crush up that bug to make red dye for lipstick." It's a strange, strange world we live in... Even if it is a rather creative one.
Well, I'm not really grossed out a lot about this ingredients; indeed some of them sound gross (infant foreskin!?), but if they do work and are considered safe, I don't see why we shouldn't use them. It's not like we took the whale vomit DIRECTLY and applied to ourselves. We use it after a certain process that makes it safe for use (I hope) and hygienic.
By the way, someone should spell-check this articles more often.
I agree with the comment made by alictasia about this article not being informative. what are thse ingredients listed as on labels? Please include information on avoiding these substances.
RE: Infant Foreskin (NouriCel-MD)
Okay. So there IS a legitimate use for infant foreskin tissue (which is thrown away otherwise) to treat burn victims without the larger risk of skin grafts taken from cadavers, or when a patient does not HAVE enough viable skin to graft FROM.
The ONLY people I can think of who would actually SEEK OUT a cosmetic made with this is PETA. After all, no ANIMALS were harmed or used to TEST the product...
it comforting to know that my deodorant might have dynamite ingredients in it. lol the bug thing was really gross and so was the whale vomit. very interesting article.
This is absolutely absurd! The bugs one is especially gross, I think the worst part is knowing that some companies still keep such ingredients in their products.... So glad they now have to disclose whether or not there are bugs in them.
I have a cream made with snail ooze and it's really great. No kidding. It's great for brightening and recovery. Snail ooze creams are also from Europe and Korean cosmetic brands are using smail ooze too. Snail ooze cream is one of the best selling items in Korea now.
Bottom line, in my opinion is this.
If people didn't buy into the idea that we MUST have red lips, supple skin, etc., etc., there would be no NEED for any of this stuff (feces???)
Why can't we allow ourselves to age with grace and dignity?
Very interesting, but NOT ALL the items were gross... Diatomaceous earth is very natural and only PART of what is used to make dynamite - and hardly what I would call "gross". We use it in our garden to get rid of bugs. Also, capsicum is hardly "gross" either. And again it's a natural derivative of a hot pepper. It's too bad we don't use more natural items. Personally, I'm glad they can find a use for road kill and other parts of animals that are already being killed. Isn't that what the native Americans were known for? Not wasting one bit! As long as something is natural, I'm not against it.
Agreed ... what's the point of grossing us out, if they're not going to give the clinical names that will actually appear on the labels? With the exceptions of tallow (which I've always found gross, but I thought was just lard from cows, not roadkill!) and glucosamine, none of these things are going to be called by their common names, so how can we avoid any of them?
But the article doesn't make sure consumers have the information they need, it gives you a little bit of info thrown in with biased opinion, and doesn't even list alternative products to use instead. They don't even give a clinical name for Bull Semen, so if you use a product with it and have a reaction, how are you going to know to check for bull semen? Are you just going to bring your doctor this entire list and have them check to see if you're allergic to everything? I'm surprised that they didn't list that Johnson's uses formaldehyde releasers (Quaternium) in some of their baby products, that's worth mentioning in my opinion, since even as an adult I used to use Johnson's products. I bet they just didn't want to deal with any backlash from listing actual names of products, and in that case, what's the use of the article?
Thank you for posting this information-its difficult to find the the source of many of these ingredients, and it gives a good explanation as to why I and others can't wear certain cosmetics and skin care products. This information is very valuable, and I very much appreciate that you have this information available. This isn't sensationalism-this is making sure consumers have information that they need to make informed choices, and to know what exactly it is that they are using-and more importantly, if there is a reaction, to know what caused it so the reaction can be treated effectively.
Interesting. While I knew of some of these ingredients and the background behind them, others I did not. A jaw dropper with the tallow possibly being derived from roadkill. Gross. But I do agree with points made in the other comments, especially OutInAPout. 6 stars, due to the added information and resources you put in- no matter how outdated it may be.
This is the kind of sensational journalism that is a huge turn off for me. The way it's written is obviously intended to make the reader go ICK...what happened to OBJECTIVE journalism? I second OutInAPout's comment. Keep this up and I'm outta here!
Most of these things are just fine and not gross at all. There are a few actually disgusting ones, but that also includes one or two that they don't do anymore. This should have been a smaller list without such a stretch which undermines the impact.
Remember- just because something is "icky" doesn't mean it's not good for you, or the best thing for the job. Penicillin is a mold, but it has saved the lives of 10s of million people.
This article reads like it should be in the beauty section of The Enquirer. Many of these ingredients have been used for hundreds of years with good result. Others are barely used at all. It's worth pointing out that your description of tallow makes it seem like a common ingredient. In fact, Cosmetics Safety Database (quoted several times in the actual write up) lists only 2 products that contain the ingredient; both pain relief creams (not the lipsticks, soaps and eye products implied in the article.)
While technically factual, this article is simply too sensationalist to take at face value.