Lush Retread
Lush Retread Reviews
-
Lush Should Re-Formulate
After being "wowed" by Lush's "Big" shampoo, some of the bath bombs, and several of their soaps, I had high expectations for this conditioner. I was greatly disappointed. It claims to be super-charged to thoroughly renew hair. It should be in a dispenser--dipping into a tub in the shower is a very inconvenient way to use a conditioner. It smelled fresh, but it hardly worked to detangle, let alone deep-condition my locks. I would never purchase this again. — 1 month, 2 weeks agoThis review is: Helpful | Not helpful | Inappropriate | 0 of 0 people said helpful
-
Drugstores have better conditioners
This is supposed to be their triple strength conditioner, yet it conditioned my hair very lightly. If I use more, it may be better, but since it's overpriced, who wants to use huge amount? It has oily residue, which may bother some people. It has no fragrance at all, which cheapes the product even more. It's not worth the $$. — 3 years, 5 months agoThis review is: Helpful | Not helpful | Inappropriate | 2 of 3 people said helpful
-
A great conditioner for fine hair
LUSH's claims that Retread is "triple strength" aren't true, but that doesn't stop it from being a great conditioner. The tub packaging is annoying (scooping it out without getting water in it while standing in a narrow shower stall is now easy feat, but it smells like violets and oranges and adds shine, softness, and body to my fine hair. I switched to Retread from a Pureology conditioner and my hair looks a lot better. — 4 years, 1 month agoThis review is: Helpful | Not helpful | Inappropriate | 2 of 4 people said helpful






too?

